Why “I am working here since 3 years” is wrong

1

The Mistake

The sentence that’s ending your interviews early

You walk into an interview. The hiring manager asks: “How long have you been working in your current role?”

You answer confidently: “I am working here since 3 years.”

You move on. The interview continues. But something has already shifted — the British or American interviewer has mentally noted your English. Not your experience. Not your skills. Your grammar. And the rest of the interview, they’re half-listening and half-wondering if your English will be a problem on the team.

This one sentence — “I am working here since 3 years” — signals to a native English speaker that you haven’t spent time in an English-speaking professional environment. It’s not rude. It’s just very visible.

The correct sentence is: “I have been working here for 3 years.”

But here’s what no one ever explains: why does your brain reach for the wrong version? And why does fixing it feel unnatural even after you know the rule?

✗ What you say

“I am working here since 3 years.”

Sounds like a grammar error immediately to any British or American professional.

जो आप बोलते हैं

✓ What you should say

“I have been working here for 3 years.”

Correct. Sounds natural and professional in any British workplace.

जो आपको बोलना चाहिए

2

Why Your Brain Does This

It’s not a grammar mistake — it’s a translation mistake

This error isn’t random. Your brain is doing something logical — it’s translating directly from Hindi. And the translation feels correct, because in Hindi, it is correct.

🧠

Hindi Brain Mapping

मैं यहाँ 3 साल से काम कर रहा हूँ।

Direct translation: “I am working here since 3 years.” — grammatically perfect in Hindi structure. Your brain maps कर रहा हूँ → “am working” and से → “since”. The logic is airtight. The English is wrong.

In Hindi, you use the present continuous tense (कर रहा हूँ) for ongoing actions — including ones that started in the past and are still happening now. Hindi has no separate “present perfect continuous” form. So your brain reaches for the closest equivalent: present continuous.

English draws a hard distinction that Hindi doesn’t make. This is the real confusion — not the grammar rule, but the fact that Hindi treats these two situations identically while English gives them completely different tenses.

The Core Distinction

Hindi: one form for everything ongoing.
English: two completely different tenses.

In Hindi, कर रहा हूँ covers both:

→ “I am working right now” (happening at this moment)
→ “I have been working for 3 years” (started in past, still continuing)

English separates these into two different tenses. Your brain was never trained to make this split — because Hindi never needed it.

3

The Visual Rule

See the difference — not just read it

The fastest way to fix this permanently is to see what each tense actually means in time. Not memorise a rule. See it.

Timeline: Present Continuous vs Present Perfect Continuous

Present Continuous is a dot on the timeline — a moment. Present Perfect Continuous is a band — it shows duration that started in the past and is still happening. Hindi uses the same word for both. English uses different tenses.

This is the switch your brain needs to make. Not “use have been” — that’s just a rule you’ll forget. The switch is: am I describing a moment, or a duration?

The One Rule That Fixes Everything

Moment → Present Continuous
Duration from past to now → Present Perfect Continuous


      Have / Has + been + verb-ing + for / since

For = length of time (“for 3 years”, “for 6 months”)
Since = starting point (“since 2021”, “since January”)

Your brain mixes up since and for too — because Hindi से covers both. “3 साल से” = “for 3 years” in English, not “since 3 years”.

4

Same Rule, More Mistakes Fixed

You’re probably making these too — same fix

Now watch the rule do the work. These aren’t separate mistakes — they’re all the same Hindi-brain translation, showing up in different sentences. Fix the rule once, fix all of them.

What you say	What to say	Why — same rule
I am working here since 3 years.	I have been working here for 3 years.	Duration (past→now). Use for, not since, with a length of time.
I am living in Delhi since childhood.	I have been living in Delhi since childhood.	Duration (past→now). Since is correct here — childhood is a starting point, not a length.
I am doing this job for long time.	I have been doing this job for a long time.	Duration (past→now). “For a long time” — always needs a in this phrase.
We are waiting for approval since last month.	We have been waiting for approval since last month.	Duration (past→now). Since last month is a starting point — correct use of since.

💡

Since vs For — the Hindi confusion

Hindi से does the job of both since AND for in English.

Since = a point in time (since 2020, since Monday, since childhood)
For = a length of time (for 3 years, for 6 months, for a long time)
Test: Can you replace it with a specific date? → since. Is it a duration? → for.

5

British Workplace Context

When this matters most in a British office

This tense comes up constantly in professional settings — not just interviews. These are the moments where getting it right signals fluency, and getting it wrong signals otherwise.

📋 Scenario — Job Interview

“How long have you been in your current role?”

✓ “I’ve been a senior analyst at Infosys for four years now, leading the compliance team.”

✗ “I am working as senior analyst since four years.” — The error signals immediately. The interviewer adjusts their mental model of your English level for the rest of the conversation.

📧 Scenario — Email / Status Update

Giving a project status in writing

✓ “We’ve been working on the migration since January and expect to complete by Q3.”

✗ “We are working on the migration since January.” — In writing, native speakers notice this immediately. Spoken errors pass faster; written errors stay on screen.

🤝 Scenario — Meeting Introduction

Introducing yourself in a cross-team meeting

✓ “I’ve been managing the vendor relationships for about two years, so I know the history here.”

This signals experience AND fluency at the same time. A small sentence doing two jobs.

Memory Anchor

“Duration needs a different tense.”

Before you speak: Is this a moment (right now)? → am/is/are + -ing.
Is this a duration that started before? → have/has been + -ing + for/since.
Train yourself to pause for half a second and ask: moment or duration?

6

Practice Quiz

Test Yourself

Can you spot the rule now?

Your score

0/6

Q1 — Choose the correct sentence for a job interview context:

Q2 — Fill in the blank: “We ___ on this project ___ last October.”

Q3 — In a meeting, you want to say “I am currently reviewing the contract” (happening right now, at this moment). Which is correct?

Q4 — Correct this sentence: “She is leading the Mumbai team since she joined in 2022.”

Q5 — Which sentence would a British manager write in a status email?

Q6 — Translate naturally: “मैं यहाँ 6 महीने से काम कर रहा हूँ।”

7

Key Takeaways

What to remember from this lesson

1

Your brain translates कर रहा हूँ → “am working” for everything ongoing. English draws a hard line: moment now vs duration from past. Different situations, different tenses.

2

Present Perfect Continuous formula: have/has + been + verb-ing + for/since. Use it whenever an action started in the past and is still continuing now.

3

Since = a specific point in time (since 2021, since Monday, since she joined). For = a length of time (for 3 years, for 6 months). Hindi से covers both — English splits them.

4

The pause-and-ask habit: Before you say something ongoing, ask yourself — Is this a moment or a duration? Moment → “am working”. Duration from past → “have been working”.

5

In British professional settings — interviews, emails, introductions — this tense comes up constantly. Getting it right doesn’t just fix grammar. It signals that you’re comfortable in an English-speaking professional environment.

Next: Why “I did not go” vs “I have not gone” confuses everyone

Grammar · Professional · Lesson 02

Next Lesson →